~Quarma

Okay, WHY do we need a sequel to RockBand? It's still making steady money and came out less than a year ago. Along with the massive amount of downloadables (either 219 or 319) and the Track Packs, they could keep a massive income flowing by just making more track packs! It would cost less money for production and they'd break even much faster, as well as have more disposable income in the end. This is just whoring out for more money, man. We have to buy another Rock Band, they'll introduce slightly upgraded controllers so we can't just use our old ones and have to buy more, and we'll probably have to buy new songs for it instead of just using our original ones. If they waited for a bit like two to three years (like Smash Bros), they'd be selling them when people are done with the first one. Releasing a sequel too fast means that those who're still using Rock Band wont think they need Rock Band 2 and that'll result in lower sales.

...according to Firefox, that'll is spelled wrong and wont is spelled right. They don't have good apostrophe rules.

Anyway, Rock Band was revolutionary and introducing a sequel so soon sort of takes some of its luster away. If they made a sequel to the original Smash Bros a year after the original, would it seem less or more innovative? Expect Rock Band 3 before the end of 2010 and for the pattern to continue.